The 2024 election results brought both anticipated outcomes and significant changes for North Dakota, affecting federal, state and local policies. With key federal races, ballot measures on marijuana legalization and property taxes, and a proposed Fargo convention center, voters have set the course for several impactful shifts. 

At the federal level, North Dakota voters largely aligned with national trends. Republican candidate Donald Trump won the state’s three electoral votes, maintaining North Dakota’s status as a Republican stronghold. Additionally, incumbent Sen. Kevin Cramer won re-election, keeping the Republican representative for North Dakota in Congress. 

At the state level, the decision to reject marijuana legalization was one of the more closely watched outcomes. Proponents argued that legalizing recreational marijuana would generate significant tax revenue, reduce law enforcement costs on marijuana-related offenses and help retain young people in the state by creating a more progressive image. However, opponents voiced concerns about potential increases in drug-impaired driving and social impacts on families and communities. Ultimately, the measure’s failure underscored a cautious approach to major policy shifts. 

The decision to reject marijuana legalization has broad effects. Economically, North Dakota will miss out on a revenue source that neighboring states are using, which could make it harder to attract new residents and businesses. Law enforcement may also still need to handle minor marijuana offenses, though supporters argue that legalization could reduce nonviolent arrests and allow police to focus on other issues. This vote shows North Dakota’s conservative values and preference for a gradual, careful approach rather than fast social changes. 

Another key measure that faced significant debate was the proposal to eliminate property taxes. Supporters argued this would relieve financial strain on homeowners and enhance North Dakota’s appeal as a place to live and invest. However, many voters expressed concerns over how local governments would sustain essential services like schools, emergency response, and infrastructure without this revenue source. Despite the appeal of lower housing costs and potentially higher home values, the measure was ultimately rejected. 

By choosing to keep property taxes, North Dakota voters have ensured steady funding for local governments, which helps maintain essential services. This decision shows that, while tax reform is of interest, voters don’t want to risk budget cuts or service issues. The rejection also leaves room for other, smaller tax relief options, like adjusting income or sales taxes, that wouldn’t strain local budgets. 

Fargo residents did vote in favor of building a new convention center, a move that signals the city’s focus on economic development and tourism. The project, aimed at attracting conferences, conventions, and other large events, promises to boost the local economy by increasing spending in the hospitality and service sectors. Supporters argue that the center will make Fargo a stronger regional destination and create new jobs, strengthening the city’s economic position.

With the convention center approval, Fargo can expect an increase in business activity, particularly among hotels, restaurants and entertainment venues, which could benefit from increased tourism and business travel. Along with boosting the local economy, the project is likely to make Fargo more attractive to potential residents, especially young professionals and families looking for a city with strong infrastructure and amenities. 

As North Dakota moves forward, the impact of these election results will be closely watched. The choices voters made on both state and local issues provide insight into their priorities for the future. While conservative values remain strong, there is an evident interest in supporting initiatives that support economic development in North Dakota’s urban centers.