The Washington Monument is an Illuminist Depiction of Sex Magick

 

FLICKR.COM Matt Popovich | PHOTO COURTESY The Washington Monument a national symbol of patriotism, or something darker?
FLICKR.COM Matt Popovich | PHOTO COURTESY
Is the Washington Monument a national symbol of patriotism, or something darker?

I believe that the Washington Monument is an Illuminist symbol representing sex magick.

Even though I believe this to be true, I admit that it is almost impossible to prove definitively. I will provide evidence for why I believe this, but ultimately I will leave it up to you to decide if my arguments are reasonable.

1.) Illuminists are pathological liars who intentionally deceive people.

The most damning evidence for this intentional deception can be seen in Albert Pike’s 1872 book, “Morals and Dogma.” Pike, himself a 33rd degree Freemason (the highest rank in Freemasonry), is one of the most influential Freemasons of all time. “Morals and Dogma” is oftentimes considered to be the Bible of Freemasonry.

The book openly encourages Freemasons to deceive people about their beliefs (including their own members), on the grounds that most people are not worthy to know the truth about God.

2.) The Washington Monument is a masonic symbol known as an obelisk. Most notably, it is a four sided, tapered pillar capped with an elongated pyramid.

This can be shown fairly easily by driving to the Masonic Temple in north Fargo (it is only a five minute drive from North Dakota State). You will notice that there is an obelisk located in between the Masonic Temple and El Zagal Shrine (the Shriners being an extension of Freemasonry). There is an additional obelisk located on the El Zagal golf course, visible from the intersection of Oak St N and 14th Ave N.

3.) The Washington Monument is a reference to sex magick. The core tenet behind sex magick is that combining masculine and feminine energy in a ritualistic manner is a way of becoming illuminated.

An overhead view of the Washington Monument will reveal it is contained within the center of two partially overlapping circles. These overlapping circles are an occult symbol known as the vesica piscis, and they represent feminine energy. The oval shape of the partially overlapped circles is a subtle reference to a vagina.

The obelisk is an occult symbol representing a captured solar ray. Being that masculine energy is typically depicted as solar (and feminine as lunar), it is fairly obvious that the obelisk represents a giant penis.

In layman’s terms, the obelisk contained within the vesica piscis is a symbolic representation of ritualistic sexual intercourse.

4.) Sex magick is a part of Freemasonry. While Freemasons will not directly promote sex magick, people that practice sex magick will promote Freemasonry.

The Beverly Hills secret society, Snctm, is one of many examples of this. Its website and Instagram profile (both not safe for work) shows numerous references to Illuminism and sex magick, the most notable being the double-headed eagle on the website’s front page.

The double-headed eagle is a masonic symbol. In fact, it is the same symbol seen on the cover of “Morals and Dogma.” I find it difficult to believe this is a coincidence.

Even if I have not convinced you about the true nature of the Washington Monument, my hope is that I will at least open you up to a new point of view.

While many Americans regard the Washington Monument as a national icon, I see it as a frivolous waste of taxpayer’s money at best. At worst, it is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state.

Additionally, you need to understand that this religion’s influence permeates every aspect of our culture, including Fargo, North Dakota. You cannot run from Illuminism if you do not like it, you have to be willing to confront it.

4 Replies to “The Washington Monument is an Illuminist Depiction of Sex Magick”

    1. You are the one that shows the symptoms of a substandard education, not me. You just used a logical fallacy known as an ad hominem attack. One of the first things they would teach you in a Philosophy 101 class is not to use ad hominem attacks.

      I know that my arguments sound outrageous, that’s why I encourage people to try and refute them; it gives me a chance to prove that they are at least plausible. But if you are going to argue, at least come up with philosophically sound reasons for why they are wrong.

Leave a Reply